zaterdag 5 april 2014

HOW TO KILL MAD DOGS OR YOUR NEIGHBOR'S FAMILY WITH KINDNESS- COMO VENDER A TORTURA E O MASSACRE COMO COUSA BOA : VENDER O IMPÉRIO AMERICANO E A PAX AMERICANA COMO COUSA SUPERIOR E O IMPÉRIO DO MAL OU DO MALI COMO COUSA A ABATER COMO UM CÃO RAIVOSO

É SIMPLES QUALQUER MASSACRE

OU EXPOSIÇÃO CULTURAL DE UM SERIAL KILLER

OU FUNDAÇÃO DA LADROAGEM DO  CAPITALISMO CIVILIZADO

PODE SER VENDIDO HOJE COMO COISA BOA

COMO A ÚNICA SAÍDA POSSÍVEL

AFINAL OS MAUS OBRIGARAM OS BONS A TORTURÁ-LOS

OS BONS NEM SEQUER QUERIAM MAS LÁ TIVERAM DE SE SACRIFICAR

A QUEDA DE UM IMPÉRIO GREGO OU ROMANO

É HOJE MUITO MAIS FACILMENTE VENDIDO

CAIU PORQUE DEUS ASSIM O QUIS

CAIU PORQUE ERA MAU E TORTURAVA AS GENTES QUE SUBMETIA

A COLONIZAÇÃO DE ÁFRICA PELOS IMPÉRIOS COLONIAIS FOI PÉSSIMA

A COLONIZAÇÃO ECONÓMICA DE ÁFRICA PELOS CHINESES OU PELOS AMERICANOS

OU PELAS DEMOCRACIAS OCIDENTAIS FOI OBVIAMENTE ÓPTIMA

SE MORREM HOJE MAIS AFRICANOS DO QUE NOS TEMPOS DA SUBMISSÃO COLONIAL

TAL DEVE-SE A NASCEREM MUITOS MAIS

E AOS CLEPTOCRATAS NACIONAIS ROUBAREM MAIS QUE OS DE IMPORTAÇÃO

É UMA EXPLICAÇÃO EM SIMPLEX

A COLONIZAÇÃO CONTINENTAL E O MASSACRE DE PRETOS OU ÍNDIOS

A DETROITIZAÇÃO DA AMÉRICA OU DA EUROPA SÃO COUSAS BOAS

AFINAL 300 MILHÕES DE ASIÁTICOS VIVEM HOJE MUITO MELHOR

HOJE TODOS OS MASSACRES E TORTURAS DO SÉCULO XVIII XIX E XX 

PODERIAM SER VENDIDOS MUITO MELHOR

TODAS AS OCUPAÇÕES PODERIAM SER RESOLVIDAS INCOMENSURAVELMENTE

MAIS DEPRESSA SE FOSSEM CONFIADAS A JORNALISTAS COM BOM GOSTO

OU A EMPRESÁRIOS COM BASTANTE CAPITAL PARA DESBARATAR

A FIM DE OBVIAMENTE GANHAR MUITO MAIS

O RITMO DA HISTÓRIA E DA HISTERIA ACELERAR-SE-IA E SERIA BOM

AS FRONTEIRAS PODERIAM SER DESMANTELADAS MAIS DEPRESSA

OS PIG'S ESVENTRADOS MAIS DEPRESSA E CARIDOSAMENTE

ENFIM OS MAUS PAGARIAM PELO QUE FIZERAM AOS BONS ALUNOS

OU BONS HELENOS UMA CURRUPTELA GREGA DESSAS.....


dinsdag 11 maart 2014

LIGAÇÕES PERIGOSAS - FUTEBOL CONSTRUÇÃO CIVIL BANCA E SOCRATES O GREGO DÁ E MÉDIO CÁ TUM TUM? NO BPN 124 MILHÕES DOS CONTRIBUINTES SÃO CATUM? CATUM É PSD? CATUM É PS? CATUM É PCP? CATUM É TUDO NÉ ASSIS OU ASSAD-INFLAÇÃO IN FLA SÃO? INFLATION? E MEDIA CÁ TUM TUM? O FUTREBOL E MEDIA O PERDÃO DAS DÍVIDAS MILIONÁRIAS É OBVIAMENTE CONSTITUCIONAL E O PRÉMIO DO EUROMILHÃO DA SEMANA VAI PARA UM JARDIM- CONSTITUIÇÃO CATUM DÁ NISTO....JÁ TUMPER É O COELHINHO DO BAMBI QUE FOI ENFORCADO PELO PESSOAL DE DIREITO -DIREITO TORTO O NOSSO NÉ?



sugestão: visualize o museu com foco de 125%

 

donderdag 27 februari 2014

NUM ESTADO SENIL ONDE OS INTERESSES NACIONAIS E A HONRA MILITAR NÃO SE COMPADECE COM O ESTADO DA NAÇÃO OU COM AS NECESSIDADES DOS POLÍTICOS SERÁ VERDADE QUE VIVEMOS NUMA MENTIRA OU SERÁ MENTIRA QUE SOBREVIVEMOS NUMA VERDADE

NÃO SE DEVE INFLACIONAR DEMASIADAMENTE UM TEXTO

SOBRE COUSAS VIRTUAIS E FANTASMAGÓRICAS

EXCEPTO SE A VERDADE DE VERDADE FOR EM ESCUDOS 1.000.000$00

OU EM CONTOS DE RÉIS 10:000$000 EM EUROS A VERDADE É RELATIVA

APENAS NO VÁCUO ESPACIAL A VERDADE É ABSOLUTA E VALE ZERO.....em ºKELVIN

NA MAÇONARIA A VERDADE TEM 33 GRAUS OU COMO SE COSTUMA DIZER DEGRAUS

NA ÁGUA A VERDADE ATINGE A MÁXIMA DENSIDADE A 4ºCENTÍGRADOS

OU CELSIUS A VERDADE NÃO SE IMPORTA COM O NOME

É VERDADEIRA EM QUALQUER PSEUDÓNIMO HETERÓNIMO OU MESMO ANÓNIMO

OU ANOME.....
 A HISTÓRIA É UMA CONSTRUÇÃO CULTURALMENTE DEPENDENTE

HÁ VERDADES E HÁ MUITAS

NÃO HÁ É VERDADES ABSOLUTAS

POIS QUANTICAMENTE FALANDO O UNIVERSO E AS SUAS VERDADES SÃO RELATIVISTAS....

SE ABRIRES A PORTA PODE SER VERDADE SE A MANTIVERES FECHADA PODE SER MENTIRA

NA VERDADE A VERDADE NÃO DEPENDE DO OBSERVADOR

PRESSUPONDO UM NÚMERO INFINITO DE UNIVERSOS E PORTANTO DE REALIDADES NENHUMA MENTIRA É VERDADEIRA NENHUMA VERDADE É MENTIRA



zaterdag 21 december 2013

THE ALEX GAMELA GAME - CHASING TORNADOS OF WORDS AND STORM'S OF WORDS IS AN OUTCAST OF THE MEDIA COVENS? IN THE SILENCE OF THE WORD FOREST SOMEONE THOUGHT OF HIM...THE BITTER TANG OF SPITTED WORDS BURNED RUNES IN THE INTERNET TIMBER...BETTER TO BE WITH TORNADOS OF WORDS THAN TO LIVE AMONG UNEASY NEO LIBERALIS VON LIBERACE...

The upward spiral and the tornado effect: monitoring the spreading of news

I should start  a category in this blog called “the spilt milk department”. I’d include all the great ideas I had in the last years and that were never developed or wrote about. I could make up excuses and say I’ve been busy (I have) or that I’m lazy (I am), but the fact is things evolve quite rapidly on the interwebz and it’s easy to blurt out a few ideas that quickly will dissolve away into cyber-oblivion, and you need time to build a solid concept. But the rule of thumb is “just do it”, and not “procrastinate until it’s perfect in your mind”. Enough crying. Here goes:
Two years ago I thought about how we could trace back to the original source of information, mostly news, on the web: the first tweet, the igniting blog post, the seminal article that got shared, sliced to quotes, linked to, built upon, changed, remixed, archived. Not only it’s a good way to understand the current online ecosystem, but if analyzed correctly, this flow could provide new insights to create new distribution strategies for news contents, and a real assessment of the impact of a specific event in social media (all media is social these days, by the way). I presented my thoughts about this last year to a class of MA students in their Cyberjournalism class at Porto University and the plan was to build a tool that would track that flow from the very start.
Of course, better said than done, except at the NYTimes, where they built a tool quite similar to my original concept called Cascade. They did in 3D, like I wanted to, and it’s beautiful to look at. Check their video but read on afterwards to dive into my own concept, which is similar in basics but somewhat different.

The way information about a news event is distributed has changed dramatically in the last years. The so called traditional media are no longer the diving force in this process rather to be substituted, in part, by the active participation of users, that became creators, distributors, and sharers of news contents, using tools like Twitter, Youtube, Facebook, blogs and other social networks.
We already know this, but what I’m looking for with this proposal is a model that provides a clearer view on this change, its consequences, and how media should rework their strategy in this decentralized logic, and take the most from it. To understand that logic allows a better, more profitable management of their resources, in gathering and subsequent information distribution, leaving their central role as source of all journalistic contents, but intervening in different parts and ways along the flow. It’s the end of the mainstream media concept and their transformation to stream media.
The ideas presented here were the basis for a prototype, that could be validated and improved with a more scientific and empirical approach. My goal was to create a three dimensional, dynamic visualization, that corresponded to reality. The NYTimes example presented above is a good example of that. But for now, I’ll use my drafts, which are quite simple, to give a basic perspective on the current and future changes in the news paradigm.
In the age of pyramids
The old paradigm
For decades, news were built and distributed in the same way,, and we have to understand the classic news model that dominated from the industrialization of journalism, specially in the 20th century, and that remained relatively unchanged even with the coming of new media like Radio or Television. The breaking point occurs with the internet and the Digital Revolution.
Media as source of the information flow
In a pretty simple way, this is how it worked:
  1. Event;
  2. Journalists gathered information in the field with the news story characters, witnesses, official entities;
  3. Information was edited, published;
  4. The audience had access to the information in print the next day or in the following news segments on TV or Radio;
  5. After consuming the news, all the information could be discussed by the readers/listeners/viewers in a more or less private way, in a direct, interpersonal relationship. The information could be recovered in new news pieces if new developments occurred;
And its useful life ended here, not long after it was created. Unless the audience members created their own archives, there weren’t many chances to recover or reuse that information, since all content (or most of it) was archived and in the possession of media companies. The main feature of this half-life of news was its caducity. Only the more relevant events would become a part of the audience’s collective memory, in a scattered, individualized and disorganized way, in most cases.
The very own ritualization of the journalistic process, with news at fixed hours and institutional establishment next to communities and sovereign bodies, contributed to make it closed and limited to a reduced number of people that determined the degree of importance of a specific event, following rules and guides, almost clerically. They were the defenders of public interest, the public opinion makers, and the power to reach the masses granted them the status of the Fourth Estate. News consumers participated in the information routine simultaneously as actors and public, with very few interference in the practice of news professionals, that held absolute control on what and how it should be published.
The media were the creating hub of all news contents, and all their work was directed from top to bottom, in a pyramidal structure, whether inside news organizations, in content distribution, or in content building (the inverted pyramid), and they were its keepers. But with the new technologies it all collapsed, and we watched the horizontalization of the news process, that now occurs also beyond the borders of the traditional journalistic structures.
From carpet bombing communication to relational communication
Relational
  1. Of or arising from kinship.
  2. Indicating or constituting relation.
So if in the previous paradigm information was static, closed, finite and with a short half-life, the current situation is pretty much the opposite. If the audience was indiscriminately bombarded with information, the internet provided room for niches, with specialized information. And links and the link economy changed everything: we can comment and quote on a specific piece of information providing immediate access to it. We share and point the path to information. Add the social media/aggregation/recommendation/distribution tools and we are no longer passive elements in the news flow, but active characters in the creation and distribution of information.
With the 24 hour news cycle and the permanent breaking news status (news are no longer “breaking” these days, they’re just “happening”; news can be  “exclusive”, but basing their importance in a time factor is, to say the least, irrelevant) the pressure on media to keep the information flowing has become intense:for example, the traditional news cycles for newspapers no longer comply with the needs of a permanently connected audience, nor the construction of ritualized information published at a specific moment if made with “breaking news” in mind.
Another thing that doesn’t work is closed content, or content that cannot be shared or distributed in different platforms. Facebook has become an important place to access information, where individual articles from specific brands chosen by users are shared and commented by personal networks immediately. Twitter was probably the first place where this happened in a massive scale. Recommendation became a simple process, that took news from the media platforms to individual platforms, that are based in the sharing logic. Check this Pew Research Center report about how people navigate news online.
What we are watching today is the “user curation of content”, where news spread faster and farther than they did, just because the users are no longer mere recipients of indiscriminate information but active participants in its distribution. This new ecosystem broke the previous model where media were in a stand bombing the audience with information, in a one way relationship, moving now to a situation where exchange is the rule.
And media is no longer the sole source of news, just remember how many events were first transmitted by users through social networks and online tools only to be picked up but news pros afterwards: earthquakes, the Iran election and, more recently, Bin Laden’s death are great examples about the role of users and social media in the distribution of news.
With these factors in mind, I thought about how we could visualize the flow of information, from the very first tweet, post, video, etc.
The upward spiral
a not as cool looking representation of the news flow
The main difference between my idea and the NY Times visualization is that I thought about a spiral instead of ramifications of content. This seemed to be the most effective way because I had a few parameters in mind: time, range and audience attention. In my draft Facebook wasn’t considered because it was 2009 and it wasn’t as important in the flow like Twitter was, and blogs had more relevance in this ecosystem.
So, this is how it works: at the epicentre there’s the event, first tweets and posts, picked up afterwards by media as breaking news, retweets/shares in social networks, comments, more media articles, new user generated content based on new information or built upon the existing one,and so on and on. Audience attention is higher at the beginning, and it fades as the flow widens. This is not a process closed in time, because information can be recovered and reutilized days, weeks, months, years later, which is another feature of digital content: it’s perennial, and database or archive journalism is something that has been growing recently.
Side view. The arrows mean "time"
These are measurable parameters, if only there was a tool to compile and calculate them…
Of course in reality things might differ, and the constant elements may vary, because media companies can be the creators of the first tweet, or other tools can be used – Iran elections had a huge impact also because of the YouTube videos made available by the protesters – but the core idea is the following: there is a root (or roots) that generate more content, linking opportunities through sharing, recommendation or referral, and construction of new content based on the pre-existing information.
What I had in mind and that Cascade does superbly is to track the various connections, and evaluate the ripple effect caused by a single piece of content. Mapping the origins of information and assess their impact can be useful not only to validate that information but also to develop new strategies in content distribution.

The Tornado Effect
The development of this flow, represented by a spiral, would create what I call the Tornado Effect. Imagine a horizontal axis, a timeline representing the event developing chronologically,  and the vertical axis where the information spirals upwards in time and connections. The more numerous the connections and links, the higher the spiral; the longer the interest lasts, the lengthier the timeline. Most events would briefly touch down and dissolve away, others would be powerful enough to drag a significant number of users and platforms into it, or even generate new tornadoes.
There is a scale to measure tornado power, the Fujita scale, that goes from F0 to F10, and I was thinking about having one applicable to these phenomena, let’s say from G1 to G10 (the Gamela scale – meant it as a joke, ok?). Events like Michael Jackson’s death, the revolutions in Northern Africa, William and Kate’s marriage would be high up in the scale; blog posts and articles shared on Twitter by a small group of people within a short period of time would be close to zero.
And if we selected paths of information, from an original source to it’s various ramifications, like we can observe in Cascade, we would have something like lightnings inside the tornado, connecting the related content dots along the spiral.  Sounds fun doesn’t it?
Implications
Leaving visual metaphors aside, what’s the purpose? First, we could analyze where does the information come from; then how it is shared and used; and finally, who contributed the most. A thorough analysis of the path of information could represent a shift in the strategy for media companies that could reconsider how to find, distribute, create and aggregate content, making it more viral, and rethinking it to augment its longevity and usefulness.
The role of the users in this process would be better observed and weighed, and a more complete view on the platforms and mechanisms they apply accessing and sharing information would be possible.
And above all, new types of journalism practices would have to be applied. Curation has become a huge concern for media pros, and there are many tools to curate content, professionally produced or not. Archive journalism would become more important than it is now, since curation is creating archives in almost real time in a way, but with these tornadoes mapped out we could infer who tweeted first, what was the relationship between events and content, and related contents, down to the millisecond, since everything online has a timestamp. Information is now perennial, and should be used taking that feature into account.
Of course, this is not a fully developed idea, and I lack the skills to build such analytic tool. But as concept, I believe it would be useful to understand the spreading of news and create new strategies from that understanding, and at the same time mapping out and monitoring the evolution of information. And the Cascade project is quite close to that.
Leave your disagreements, ideas, praises, this week’s lottery numbers in the comment box. Thank you.

picture shamefully stolen from a place I can't remember now
Related posts:
  1. Re-conceptualizing the news product – Guest post @ Innovative Interactivity
  2. PortugalDailyView.com: Portuguese news in English
  3. news:rewired – city university, london, 14/01/2010
  4. Honeycomb: News vs UX | Notícias vs Experiência do utilizador
  5. Of Past and Future: Archives and information’s lifespan

zaterdag 19 oktober 2013

QUANDO SER CIDADÃO É SERVIR COMO LEGIONÁRIO NUM IMPÉRIO POR PAIXÃO EXPEDICIONÁRIO SERVIR A NOÇÃO DE NAÇÃO É SER CORSÁRIO DA GLOBAL MANIFESTAÇÃO OU DA INFESTAÇÃO GLOBAL QUE HÁ SÉCULOS É BANAL

NAS GUERRAS DO BEM

E DO MAL

COMO CONVEM....

É NORMAL

SERVIR COMO LEGIONÁRIO

DA NAÇÃO

DO AMASSÃO MAÇÃO

É DE FACTO EXTRA ORDINÁRIO....

MORRER POR UMA NOÇÃO

DE PAZ MUNDIAL

É SER UMA MISS MUNDO

COM MÍSSIL INTERCONTINENTAL....

É IR AO FUNDO

DA LOUCURA GERAL

E VEM DE LONGE

DO FUNDO DOS TEMPOS


Sunday, December 26, 2010
C’EST A CRAONNE SUR LE PLATEAU – SOUDAIN DANS LA NUIT ET DANS LE SILENCE
Adieu la vie, adieu l’amour, Adieu toutes les femmes.
C’est bien fini, c’est pour toujours,
De cette guerre infâme.
C’est à Craonne, sur le plateau,
Qu’on doit laisser sa peau
Car nous sommes tous condamnés
C’est nous les sacrifiés !
Quand au bout d’huit jours, le r’pos terminé,
On va r’prendre les tranchées,
Notre place est si utile
Que sans nous on prend la pile.
Mais c’est bien fini, on en a assez,
Personn’ ne veut plus marcher,
Et le coeur bien gros, comm’ dans un sanglot
On dit adieu aux civ’lots.
Même sans tambour, même sans trompette,
On s’en va là haut en baissant la tête.
…..Adieu la vie, adieu l’amour,
Adieu toutes les femmes.
C’est bien fini, c’est pour toujours,
De cette guerre infâme.
C’est à Craonne, sur le plateau,
Qu’on doit laisser sa peau
Car nous sommes tous condamnés
C’est nous les sacrifiés !
C’est malheureux d’voir sur les grands boul’vards
Tous ces gros qui font leur foire ;
Si pour eux la vie est rose,
Pour nous c’est pas la mêm’ chose.
Au lieu de s’cacher, tous ces embusqués,
F’raient mieux d’monter aux tranchées
Pour défendr’ leurs biens, car nous n’avons rien,
Nous autr’s, les pauvr’s purotins.
Tous les camarades sont enterrés là,
Pour défendr’ les biens de ces messieurs-là.
au Refrain
Huit jours de tranchées,
huit jours de souffrance,
Pourtant on a l’espérance
Que ce soir viendra la r’lève
Que nous attendons sans trêve.
Soudain, dans la nuit et dans le silence,
On voit quelqu’un qui s’avance,
C’est un officier de chasseurs à pied,
Qui vient pour nous remplacer.
Doucement dans l’ombre,
sous la pluie qui tombe
Les petits chasseurs
vont chercher leurs tombes.
Refrain
Ceux qu’ont l’pognon, ceux-là r’viendront,
Car c’est pour eux qu’on crève.
Mais c’est fini, car les trouffions
Vont tous se mettre en grève.
Ce s’ra votre tour, messieurs les gros,
De monter sur l’plateau,
Car si vous voulez la guerre,
Payez-la de votre peau …
Ó RATAZANA IMUNDA
DA GUERRA QUE MUNDOS COBRE
TUA LOUCA FÉ INUNDA
AS TERRAS QUE DESCOBRE
É A FRAGMENTAÇÃO
DO IMPÉRIO ROMANO
DESSE IMPÉRIO MAÇÃO
EM QUE SER FINO
É TER MANO
COM CHALET ALPINO…

C'EST A CRAONNE SUR LE PLATEAU - SOUDAIN DANS LA NUIT ET DANS LE SILENCE Adieu la vie, adieu l'amour,
Adieu toutes les femmes.
 C'est bien fini, c'est pour toujours,
 Mais c'est bien fini, on en a assez, Personn' ne veut plus marcher,
 Même sans tambour, même sans trompette, On s'en va là haut en baissant la tête.
 Ce s'ra votre tour, messieurs les gros,
De monter sur l'plateau,
Car si vous voulez la guerre,
 Payez-la de votre peau !
A GUERRA DO LOUCO

TEVE SEUS AZARES

E SOUBE-LHE A POUCO

AGORA O LOPES SOARES

VAI-SE ÀS COLÓNIAS E ZÁS

UMA PORRADA NA TOLA

VAI-SE AOS SOBAS E PÁS

AMARROTA-LHES A CARTOLA

ESTA É A CARTILHA

DA MALTA QUE PILHA

É A PROVA DOS NOVE

NO ANO QUE É DEZANOVE....


dinsdag 17 september 2013

A ESQUERDA NA SINISTRA PÁTRIA DOS CADASTRADOS CONDENADOS A SEREM UMA SOCIEDADE ANÓNIMA DE POBRES A BEM DA NAÇÃO DO AMASSÃO MAÇÃO INDA SE FÔSSEMOS UMA REPÚBLICA DAS BANANAS COMO A PÁTRIA DO CORSÁRIO DAS ILHAS

A ESQUERDA É UMA ORIENTAÇÃO ESPACIAL

COM ORIGENS HISTÉRICAS NUMA REVOLUÇÃO OU REVELOUÇÃO

QUE LEVOU O POVO DA FOME PARA A FOME

E A BURGUESIA DOS IMPOSTOS A DEVER

AO PODER DE LANÇAR IMPOSTOS

DEU UMA NOVA DINÂMICA ÀS VELHAS ORDENS MUNDIAIS

DOS INDÍGENAS VERSUS A ÉLITE DOS CONQUISTADORES

PASSOU-SE AO TRIUNFO DOS MESTIÇOS

E AO TRIUNFO DO ZUMBI DOS PALMARES DO HAITI

O EXÉRCITO ARISTOCRÁTICO TORNOU-SE BURGUÊS

MAS CONTINUOU A EXIGIR RESPEITO

E O VIL ATAQUE À CONDIÇÃO MILITAR

CONTINUA DANDO BABADÉ E GOLPE DE ESTADO

OU CU D'É TAT SEGUNDO SOARES´DORAVANTE RESUMIDO A S.S. SUA SANTA IDADE

ASSIM AS ESQUERDAS E AS DIREITAS

COMO TODOS OS REGIMES ANTES DELAS E DEPOIS DE SE EXTINGUIREM

SEJAM POVOADAS POR BARÕES DE LAVOS

OU PORTELAS ESQUIZÓIDES DONDE BROTAM  MÁRIOS E SILAS

SERÃO SEMPRE DIVIDIDAS EM CASTAS

E OUTRAS GENTES POUCO CASTAS OU SEM CASTA PARA O GASTO

E CADA UMA COM SEUS DIREITOS DE BICADA....

LOGO REFERIR ALGO COMO DE ESQUERDA

NECESSITA DA CONCORDÂNCIA DE SEUS ÍMPARES....

dinsdag 4 juni 2013

DA ARQUITECTURA DOS TEMPOS QUE SE ABREM ÀS REVOLUÇÕES E DOS TEMPOS QUE FECHAM AS REVOLUÇÕES EM FORMAÇÕES LIMITADAS

UMA BOA OU MÁ ÇA DEPENDS, REVOLUTION

NÃO DEPENDE DE ESPAÇOS ABERTOS PARA SE FAZER

MAS PARA TRIUNFAR  OU AO MENOS DAR UMA BOA LUTA

UMA REVOLUÇÃO DEPENDE DE NÚMEROS

E SE É VERDADE QUE PODE SER FEITA EM ESTÁDIOS DE FUTEBOL

APRAZ MAIS À PSICOLOGIA DAS MASSAS FAZÊ-LA EM PRAÇAS

SE A REVOLUÇÃO É URBANA

OU NOS CAMPOS SE É CAMPESINA

OU NAS MONTANHAS SE DEPENDE DA FALTA DE OXIGENAÇÃO

PARA TRIUNFAR NOS CÉREBROS DOS REVOLUCIONÁRIOS

PARIS MEDIEVAL E BURGUESA ARDEU NAS FRONDAS

E NAS REVOLUÇÕES E MOTINS QUE NÃO CHEGARAM A SÊ-LAS

REVOLUÇÕES, CLARO ESTÁ

PARIS EM CÓLERA

MADRID FEBRIL QUE SE LEVANTA OU CAI EM PESO

SOBRE O OCUPANTE OU A TIRANIA INTERNA

TRIUNFA EM RUELAS E BECOS SEM SAÍDA

EM LABIRINTOS DE RUAS E PEQUENAS PRAÇAS

MAS A REVOLUÇÃO MORRE NAS AVENIDAS LARGAS

NAS PRAÇAS GORDAS

ONDE OS CANHÕES OU OS TANQUES

CILINDRAM OS REVOLUCIONÁRIOS

OU FAZEM-NOS EM TIRAS DE CARNE RECICLÁVEL

MAS O ESTADO CONTEMPORÂNEO

É NESTE SÉCULO XXIº AVESSO AO MASSACRE PÚBLICO

É CONTRÁRIO À FORÇA REPRESSIVA MANIFESTA

ASSIM CURIOSAMENTE OU NÃO

O ESTADO REMETE-SE A ...

fazer o contrário do estado pós napoleónico

que abre avenidas largas e praças imensas para melhor poder massacrar a tiro de canhão os revolucionários

o estado actual hoje fecha as praças ou constrói nelas
para se impedir a si próprio de ter que os massacrar nas praças

é o resultado das revoluções darem bons momentos televisivos e internéticos